Just from today, so far...

Almost every day, articles and claims are made that this proves or disproves global warming, written or made by people who have not the slightest idea of how complex the studies are. Below, in sections 2 and 3, I refer to two local studies which, as you will see, are being widely confused with 'global warming', pro or con.

What is particularly amazing is the incredible dogmatism of the ignorant writers of these items. Yet more examples of the arrogance of ignorance.

The first section gives some idea of the complexity of these studies, both parts being taken from today. The second section has a claim for a localised study in Asia, purporting to be global. The third section has this week's example of the extreme "it ain't happening" tendency, which makes the contrary claim with the same error.

Continued at http://www.abelard.org/news/ecology0708.php#tracking_global_warming_110807

About the Author

i studied education.... came to the conclusion that what mattered was understanding behaviour (psychology) read up on every psych theory i could get my hands on... concluded that it was mostly pre-scientific... identified the prime problem as poorly structured language... concluded that advance was only possible with adequate language... ended up applying empirics to language...